Saturday, March 5, 2011

Misdiagnosing

In light of our class discussions in the last few weeks on the importance of acquiring correct information in the field of public health, the bbc ran this article on misdiagnosed patients in the UK. While the 5% noted in the article represents a small proportion of the overall population, an improper diagnosis will have an affect on the treatment plan of a patient. Given, that according to the article, a further 1 million people in the UK have diabetes but don't know, many more people could be affected by procedural errors like this.
This scenario presents the need to be more efficient in disease diagnosis. There represents a need to create tests that reduce the likelihood of false negatives or positives. In addition, steps need to be taken to remove administrative errors such as incorrectly recording the patient's disease status. If the goal of healthcare is to provide the appropriate and necessary treatments to ease the burden of disease for each and every person in the population, then these errors need to be further minimized. In addition, England's medical systems has a much better infrastructure in dealing with and lessening these errors. Other countries that may not have an as established healthcare system will probably have a much higher rate of these errors and may potentially have adverse effects on the disease prevention in these countries. Such mistakes with far-reaching diseases like malaria or cholera could be devastating.

1 comment:

  1. I am really glad to finally see an article on this, because honestly it is so crucial to the success of both the medical and public health fields combined. However, I think a reason why this could be such a problem is because of the fact that these two fields will need to merge so closely to fix it! I really liked what you had to say about it- and I like the fact that you saw the need to create new tests themselves, rather than taking on the huge task of refiguring how to clean up the messes of the ones we are using now. It seems like a much smarter, much more efficient way of doing things.

    ReplyDelete